Testimony of the
Oregon Forest Biomass Working Group
to the Eugene Water and Electric Board
on the Seneca Biomass Project in
The Oregon Departments of Forestry and Energy established the Oregon Forest Biomass Working Group (FBWG) as directed by Senate Bill 1072 passed by the 2005 Oregon Legislature.
Membership of
the FBWG includes representatives of the energy industry, legislature,
non-governmental organizations, state agencies, federal agencies, forest industry, and
entrepreneurs.
The FBWG has been addressing
the following issues related to forest biomass: 1) predictable supply; 2)
outreach to stakeholders and the public; 3) supportive regulatory environment;
4) research and development; 5) extraction, production, and infrastructure
development; and 6) economics and market development.
In January 2007, the FBWG
submitted its report to the Governor’s Renewable Energy Working Group. Among the
report’s conclusions is that development of renewable energy using woody biomass
should be supported at the state and federal levels. The report recognizes that
use of woody biomass to coproduce electric energy and process heat that can be
used for processes such as drying lumber is a good near-term way to produce
renewable energy.
The Forest Biomass Working
Group does not lend support or opposition to individual projects. However, we do
believe that the Seneca biomass project, as we understand it falls within the
type of projects included in the recommendations of our report. We also believe
that the logging residues and byproduct residuals from local sawmills can
provide a supplementary supply of feedstock without a drastic increase of
harvesting levels.
The FBWG reviewed and
supported the recommendations of a report by the Oregon Forest Resources
Institute (OFRI) titled, Biomass Energy
and Biofuels from Oregon’s Forests, which is available to order or download
on line at: www.oregonforests.org under
publications. The OFRI report
concluded that near term use of woody biomass for combined heat and power is the
most likely use of large amounts of woody biomass.
The FBWG has also worked to
support biomass removal from our forests when it occurs in an environmentally
responsible manner using best management practices that look out for soil,
plant, wildlife, air and water quality, Members of the FBWG reviewed and
provided comments on a report submitted by the State Forester to the Governor
and the Legislature on December 1, 2008 titled: Environmental Effects of Forest
Biomass Removal. This report
contained a literature search on the subject and also had findings and
recommendations. Additional reports
are to be submitted to the Legislature in the
future.
One of the concerns raised
regarding the Seneca Biomass Project is that there will not be enough mill
residuals to meet the plant’s fuel needs and that green trees will need to be
cut to meet the fuel requirements of the power plant. We do not believe that
this concern is founded on reliable information.
Information summarized in
the OFRI report indicates that an average 18.8 MW electrical generating plant
would burn approximately 132,000 bone-dry tons of wood waste annually. This is
approximately equivalent to 264,000 green tons.
The OFRI report estimates
that a total of 2 million bone-dry tons per year of woody biomass could be
available from forest restoration thinning, juniper rangeland restoration, and
logging residue. This is in
addition to the mill residuals that are already being fully utilized by
industry. Of these available sources of woody biomass, the one most applicable
to the Seneca Biomass project to supplement mill residuals is logging residue.
Studies summarized in the
OFRI report estimate that about 1.8 million bone-dry tons of logging residue is
produced in
Seneca manages about 165,000
acres of company land in Lane and
It should be noted that
logging residue that is used in a woody biomass combined heat and power plant
will not be burned in a slash burn. Combustion in a combined-heat-and-power
(CHP) plant is much more efficient and much less particulate matter is produced.
Thank you for the
opportunity to present this testimony. If you have questions regarding this
testimony, please contact Mike Cloughesy of the Oregon Forest Resources
Institute at cloughesy@ofri.com.
Respectfully
submitted,
Joe Misek
Mike Cloughesy
FBWG Co-Chair
FBWG Outreach Subgroup Co-Chair
Oregon Department of Forestry
Oregon Forest Resources Institute