[Libs-Or] A response to critics of my post about "American Dirt"

[Marci Jenkins]

Once again sir, this has nothing to do with Mrs. Cummins, her book, or censorship. I acknowledge it is VERY difficult for a white man to understand what means be rejected and ignored due to the color of your skin, your nationality, your accent despite all the talent you bring to the table.

I wish your suggestions for Latinx authors to seek other publishers or self publish their books were as easy as it sounds. Once again, let me be clear, a person of color that dare to challenge the system of oppression the same system that is being fed by centuries of colonialist mind set, is automatically good for nothing, unless he/she/x  leaves their identity and  dignity behind to assume the "white wanna be" stereotype and embrace a life time of denial.

You probably also never met any talent Latinx authors that open the trunk of their cars and sell their amazing books after church mass because their accent is too "thick" and they were denied an interview to promote their book that by the way (as you suggested) was self published with the help of donations.

Sir, I urge you to spend some quality time with a co-worker of color and expand your knowledge of what means to be a BIPOC in this nation beyond Oprah and Sandra Cisneros. This is NOT politics, this is OUR life on a daily basis and when we decide enough is enough we receive opposition from men such as yourself that perhaps never experienced oppression and hatred and that was certainly never sabotaged due to the color of your skin.

Please allow us to fight OUR fights with the respect we deserve.

Marci





________________________________________
From: Libs-Or [libs-or-bounces at listsmart.osl.state.or.us] on behalf of Tony Greiner [tony_greiner at hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 11:13 PM
To: libs-or at listsmart.osl.state.or.us
Subject: [Libs-Or] A response to critics of my post about  "American Dirt"

This message originated outside of the City of McMinnville.

________________________________

The range of responses on my post about how libraries can protect themselves from the censors of American Dirt makes me think that the writers of some of these posts didn’t bother to read mine, just as I doubt that all the people who signed the letter to Oprah read American Dirt in the week between its publication and the sending of the letter. But I will respond to the main statements in opposition to my idea that we should defend American Dirt should the censors come to our library doors,  and to stand up for Cummins or any author from being mobbed by those who seek political gain at her expense.


First, some respondents made of point of saying that their library had bought copies, of the book, and that no library had burned or banned it.  That's true- but I never said that those things occurred.   I do anticipate that there may be those that call for libraries to remove or not buy the book.  If that happens, I offered an argument that libraries can use in defense of having books where an author of one race writes about another. That is a defense of libraries, and I do not understand why some librarians reject that idea.


Nick Schiller put forth the idea that censorship can only be done by a government. That is a common idea, but it is incorrect.  For years, including my childhood, the Catholic Church published a List of Prohibited Books, commonly called “The Index.” Practicing Catholics were told they needed to get permission before they could read them- and I remember my mother consulting the list one day after mass. My understanding is that this list had a chilling effect on publishers, who tended to avoid publishing books that would be avoided by members of the largest denomination in the country. That’s censorship.


The “Motion Picture Production Code” also known as the “Hays Code” was a voluntary creation of Hollywood Studios that prevented directors from making films that had vulgar words, passionate kissing, cursing, homosexuality, miscegenation, and other things.  This code lasted until 1968, when the present ratings system was adopted. The “Comics Code Authority” served a similar function. Censorship can be practiced by non-governmental bodies.


In this case, the attacks on author Jeanine Cummins have the clear intent of chilling future authors who want try writing a book with characters from another culture, and publishers who are willing to distribute their work. To say this is not a form of censorship is disingenuous.


If some people are unhappy with how books by Latin writers are promoted, then they have the option of working with publishers, or starting their own company. Dragging down an author who has had success in the business end of publishing doesn’t elevate anyone else.


As for the “Cultural Appropriation” claim, that is a Potemkin Village. (Is it cultural appropriation that I used a Russian term?)   I shared the list of distinguished writers who wrote about another race and culture. Where are the cries of cultural appropriation against those writers? An writer has the right to telling the story they want to tell.  Publishers have the right to promote and sell the titles they choose. We don't need another Index.  If someone doesn’t like a book, they can criticize it on its literary merits, but to attack the author, claiming that she does not have the right to tell a story of her choosing because her skin is of the wrong color, or she was born in a different country, or speaks a different language is wrong. The name-calling and threats to disrupt a book signing is immoral, perhaps criminal. Librarians should oppose efforts to silence anyone’s voice.


Lastly, my concerns about these attacks have nothing to do with “White Privilege.”  They have to do with protecting any writers who are attacked by the mob because they dared to stretch themselves and write a story of another culture, or gender, or race. The color of my skin has nothing to do with it.  My commitment to the core library value of supporting Freedom of Expression has everything to do with it. I am sorry that there are librarians who have abandoned that principal.


**tony_greiner at hotmail.com**

________________________________